| Computer Science and Engineering professor|
UC San Diego Professors' Theory Vindicated
San Diego, CA, July 21, 2005 -- Comparing the genomes of humans and seven other mammals, an international team of evolutionary sleuths has confirmed a theory put forward by scientists at the University of California, San Diego two years ago: that fragile regions exist in the human genome that break over and over again in the course of evolution.
The UCSD researchers who advanced that theory of 'fragile' rather than 'random' breakage - Jacobs School of Engineering professor Pavel Pevzner, and mathematics professor Glenn Tesler - were among the team of 25 scientists involved in the new study, reported in the July 22 issue of the journal Science.
The publication appears to put an end to a debate that has raged in the field of bioinformatics. For thirty years before Pevzner and Tesler's 2003 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists widely agreed that evolutionary changes happened at random locations along the genome. After the UCSD paper disputed that long-held belief, one of the field's pioneers, David Sankoff from the University of Ottawa, claimed to have found a mistake in their logic.
|Math professor Glenn Tesler outlines the goals of the international team.|
|Tesler explains the compu-tational comparison used to analyze the genetic data. |
"We have been waiting to see whether we were right about evolutionary hotspots existing somewhere in the genome," said Pevzner, who holds the Ronald R. Taylor Chair in the Jacobs School's Computer Science and Engineering department. "With this new study, we clearly see the position in these mammalian genomes where rearrangements happen repeatedly, just as earthquakes tend to happen more frequently along geological fault zones."
Among other findings of the study based on computational comparisons of the human, mouse, rat, cow, pig, dog, cat and horse genomes:
>> Chromosomal evolution has accelerated since the extinction of dinosaurs 65 million years ago; and
>> Many of the 'preferred' sites of genome rearrangement are also involved in human cancers.
"This study has revealed many hidden secrets on the nature and timing of genome evolution in mammals, and it demonstrates how the study of basic evolutionary processes can lead to new insights into the origin of human diseases," said Harris Lewin, director of the Institute for Genomic Biology at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), who led the study with William J. Murphy of Texas A&M University.
A breakpoint is where one chromosome has split and the DNA is rearranged by the insertion of a piece from another chromosome or a different part of the same chromosome. The researchers found that as species evolve, chromosomes tend to break in the same places. Evidence for such a pattern had been suggested previously by UCSD's Pevzner and Tesler (see Related Links), but the new study is the first to show the phenomenon on a genome-wide basis when comparing a large number of species.
|CSE professor Pavel Pevzner puts the latest|
study in context.
|The bioinformatics expert outlines the major findings of the research. |
In all, 1,159 pair-wise breakpoints were found among the genomes of human and six non-primate species. Using a bioinformatics tool, researchers aligned and compared the breakpoints across species and constructed an evolutionary scenario for chromosomal rearrangements among all genomes and ancestors.
According to the study, one of the most gene-dense regions of the human genome is characterized by recurrent breaks in different mammalian lineages, notably dog, cat, cattle, and rodents. "Nobody yet understands why certain locations are fragile," said UCSD's Pevzner. "Many people are trying to answer this question, but I suspect it will take another couple of years to find an answer."
Chromosomal breakpoints have been implicated as potentially major triggers for cancers and many other human diseases. The multi-species comparison showed significant overlapping with breakpoints that occur in a variety of human cancers. The researchers theorize that chromosome rearrangements that result in the activation of cancer-causing genes are related to the propensity of chromosomes to break and form new combinations as new mammalian species evolve.
"This is probably the first large-scale demonstration that certain recurrent cancer breakpoints happen around areas where evolutionary rearrangement occur," said Pevzner, whose lab is collaborating separately with UC San Francisco medical researchers on a study of chromosomal rearrangements in cancer. "But it will require much higher-resolution data to prove convincingly that there is a correlation between evolutionary fragility and cancer fragility."
| Genome architecture of the ancestors of three mammalian lineages from the|
seven starting genomes, and compared to the human genome (far left). Pigs
and cattle (Cetartiodactyla) and cats and dogs (Carnivora) share a common
ferungulate ancestor. That ancestor and the common progenitor of primates
and rodents trace their lineage to a boreoeutherian ancestor.
Rates of evolutionary change were obtained by analyzing the placements of breakpoints in the genomes of the species studied. The study estimates that since a massive comet or asteroid struck Earth 65 million years ago and triggered the extinction that killed off the dinosaur, rates of chromosomal evolution among the species have increased from two- to five-fold.
"The widespread origin and diversification of most mammalian orders after the dinosaur extinction, due to exploitation of new ecological niches, may have facilitated isolation and opportunities for the fixation of chromosomal differences," said Texas A&M's Murphy.
For his part, UCSD's Pevzner notes that the speed of discovery in genomics is also accelerating. "Just two years after we predicted the existence of these evolutionary hotspots, this international team was able to identify the regions of the human genome where rearrangements are more likely to occur," said Pevzner. "This pace of discovery is phenomenal if you consider that it took more than 14 years for someone to photograph Pluto after astronomer Percival Lowell first predicted the existence of 'Planet X.'"
CSE professor Pavel Pevzner puts the latest study in context. Length: 1:54 The bioinformatics expert outlines the major findings of the research. Length: 1:43 Math professor Glenn Tesler outlines the goals of the international team. Length: 2:33 Tesler explains the computational comparison used to analyze the genetic data. Length: 3:51
Science Magazine »
PNAS June 23, 2003 »
National Institutes of Health »
National Human Genome Research Institute »
UIUC Institute for Genomic Biology »
UCSD Department of Mathematics »
National Cancer Institute »
Texas A&M »
2003 News Release »
More Computer Science and Engineering News Via RSS